My Grading System
A+ = Masterpiece (I hold back on this one.) / A = Great. / A- = Really Good. / B+ = Good. / B = Decent (Serviceable). / B- = Flawed but okay (For those times there's something redeeming about the work). / C+ = Not very good (Skip it). C = Bad. / C- = Awful. / F = Complete Disaster (I hold back on this one too).
Note on Spoilers: I will try to avoid ruining a story by going into too much detail. But if I wish to include some revealing points to my analysis I will try to remember to add a separate spoiler paragraph.
Note on Spoilers: I will try to avoid ruining a story by going into too much detail. But if I wish to include some revealing points to my analysis I will try to remember to add a separate spoiler paragraph.
Monday, February 4, 2013
Solaris (1972)
This boring
endurance test could be titled the Russian 2001: A Mind-numbing Odyssey. I
should have known what I was about to get myself into when I realized that
Andrey Tarkovskiy was the same director who tortured my attention span with
Stalker. While Kurbrick’s science fiction film is slow, it’s also visually
mind-blowing and seems to be going somewhere. Tarkovskiy seems intent on making
a film without any narrative push and to present a hero as uninteresting and
underdeveloped as a walking painting. I know there are many fans of this film
and I’ve read some positive reviews but there is no way I could have sat
through this in one sitting. And what kills me is that the story is actually
really cool. I love the idea of a guy going up into space and seeing a copy of
his dead wife. I love the various ideas this film explores. I even think the
last image is beautifully haunting and impressive. Yet in the end what I saw
was a film without tempo, a drama without heart. Grade: C
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
No comments:
Post a Comment