My Grading System
A+ = Masterpiece (I hold back on this one.) / A = Great. / A- = Really Good. / B+ = Good. / B = Decent (Serviceable). / B- = Flawed but okay (For those times there's something redeeming about the work). / C+ = Not very good (Skip it). C = Bad. / C- = Awful. / F = Complete Disaster (I hold back on this one too).
Note on Spoilers: I will try to avoid ruining a story by going into too much detail. But if I wish to include some revealing points to my analysis I will try to remember to add a separate spoiler paragraph.
Note on Spoilers: I will try to avoid ruining a story by going into too much detail. But if I wish to include some revealing points to my analysis I will try to remember to add a separate spoiler paragraph.
Tuesday, July 5, 2011
Freakonomics (2010)
When I saw the trailer for this documentary based on the best-selling book of the same title I became very interested. I love the idea that truths we all take for granted are not true at all. Of the four segments of this film I'd say only two are really that eye-opening. The first part deals with the power of naming. I did find it funny how lower income parents tend to name their children popular names that upper-class families picked hence turning that name into a trite imitation. Slightly interesting. The second segment is about Sumo wrestling and cheating. Boring. The third segment deals with the kind of controversial analysis I was excepting: crime rates in association with abortion rates. Very interesting. The last segment sheds some light on incentive programs and how ineffective they are, especially for education. Interesting. Overall I was disappointed in this film. I would have liked there to have been more segments and felt the producers missed the mark. I'd not call this a bad film but nowhere near as good as I had hoped. Grade: B.
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
No comments:
Post a Comment